Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Fic from deleted journals, fair game?

 Hello, I'm new and I have an issue/question. Recently an author deleted their fic from LJ and FF.net by deleting their accounts. The author cannot be reached. I've saved said fic as a PDF and don't know if I can distribute it.

In *my* opinion, this should be fine. After all the author posted the fic to the public. I'm not saying by doing so that they gave up the rights. I'm saying by doing so, they acknowledge the risk of doing so. In addition since posting it to the public, doesn't that mean they wanted it to be seen? That they didn't care if it was to be seen? With that in mind, why wouldn't it be ok to distribute said fic? It has the old author credited. Like I said, just my opinion.

Can I or can't I? I've looked up LJ TOS and FF.NET TOS and they pretty much, to me, say, if you post on our site, we are not responsible for whatever happens.


Apr. 20th, 2011 12:44 pm (UTC)
I just make the point that to say that "legally" one is not permitted to do so is incorrect. It's my idea (and that of the government's) that unless it can be held up in a court of law it just doesn't fit the bill; and fanfiction will not hold up as a copyrighted work.

I think maybe the problem was you didn't read my whole comment, because I clearly argued in the alternative, with one paragraph of "if you subscribe to the idea that a person has any right in fanfic" and one paragraph of "if you subscribe to the idea that none of us have any copyright in fan work." The line between infringing derivative works and transformative works that are protected (and independently copyrightable) under the fair use exception is not a bright one, and there are legal scholars and lay persons who make compelling arguments on both sides of the debate. (See http://fanlore.org/wiki/Legal_Analysis for citations to several articles published in legal and scholarly journals that debate this topic.) You've come down clearly on one side of the debate, and that's perfectly legitimate, but that doesn't make my pointing out that there are two schools of thought on this issue wrong.
This Community should be used for informative and educational purposes only or to give the public a general understanding of the law.
Nothing in this community, its posts or the comments thereto should be considered as specific advice. Your access to and use of this Community means that you understand and acknowledge that no attorney-client relationship exists between you and any poster or commenter hereto, and that the Community should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney/counselor/solicitor in your jurisdiction.


Fandom Lawyers

Page Summary

Latest Month

April 2015
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Jared MacPherson